EA Censors Ukrainian City Over Battlefield 6 Launch
In a move that has understandably irked a significant portion of its player base, Electronic Arts (EA) has seemingly imposed a blanket ban on its digital services for gamers in Zaporizhzhia, a major city in southeastern Ukraine. This sudden restriction means that residents of Zaporizhzhia are unable to access not only the highly anticipated Battlefield 6, which recently launched to massive numbers, but also any other titles developed and published by EA. The timing couldn't be worse, with Battlefield 6 already attracting close to 750,000 concurrent players, many of whom are experiencing what can only be described as an unwelcome and bewildering "gift" from the gaming giant.
Widespread Outage and Frustrated Gamers
Reports have flooded EA's official forums, detailing a widespread inability for Zaporizhzhia-based users to connect to the company's services. The EA App itself refuses to launch without a Virtual Private Network (VPN), and games have been unplayable since October 9th. Crucially, according to frustrated gamers and corroborated by outlets like ITC.ua, this issue appears to be geographically confined. While players in Lviv, Kyiv, and other Ukrainian regions are reportedly experiencing no disruptions, attempting to connect from Zaporizhzhia's IP addresses triggers an immediate service restriction message. This same restriction message appears even when trying to create a new EA account, stating, "Your request cannot be fulfilled. Service restrictions are in effect." Numerous screenshots shared online by affected users visually confirm the loss of access to EA's games and platforms.
The Root Cause: Geolocation and Sanctioned Territories
The underlying reason for this drastic measure, while perhaps technically understandable from a corporate compliance perspective, is proving deeply unpopular. EA, like many international companies, operates under a policy of blocking access to its products in territories classified as "sanctioned" or occupied. It appears that EA's internal geolocation database has categorized Zaporizhzhia, despite it remaining under Ukrainian control, alongside occupied territories. This misclassification has led to the city's inhabitants being inadvertently caught in the crossfire of these corporate restrictions. One user shared their workaround on X (formerly Twitter): "I'm also from Zaporizhzhia. The day before the release, my EA account also stopped logging in. I bought a static (white) IP from my provider, and everything immediately became normal." This highlights the IP-based nature of the restriction.
A Stark Contrast with Russia
What makes this situation particularly galling for Ukrainian gamers is the stark contrast with the experience in Russia. Battlefield 6, for instance, has not encountered similar wholesale blocking in Russia. While some Russian players have reported isolated issues with matchmaking – experiencing a black screen and being kicked back to the main menu when searching for a new game – the core game functionality and single-player campaigns remain accessible. This partial functionality, even with reports of needing a VPN for online play, stands in stark opposition to the complete shutdown experienced in Zaporizhzhia. Testimonials from Russian gamers in Steam reviews and Telegram channels suggest that the service in Russia is not entirely blocked, merely exhibiting partial issues for online features, unlike the absolute ban in Zaporizhzhia.
Broader Implications and EA's Silence
EA is not the first major tech company to impose city-wide restrictions. In August, users reported widespread connectivity problems and critical glitches with Zoom in their respective regions, indicating a potential trend of broad-stroke geolocation issues impacting Ukrainian users. Electronic Arts has yet to issue an official statement regarding the Zaporizhzhia situation. ITC.ua has reached out to EA for clarification on the embargo affecting Battlefield 6 and their other products. This perplexing decision by EA coincides with significant corporate shifts, as the company was acquired by investors for $55 billion earlier in October. Among the investors are Saudi Arabia's Public Investment Fund, Affinity Partners (linked to Jared Kushner), and investment firm Silver Lake, a development that could signal future strategic changes within the company.
Comments (0)
There are no comments for now